翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Peterstone Gout
・ Peterstone Priory
・ Peterstow
・ Peterstown House
・ Peterstown, Illinois
・ Peterstown, West Virginia
・ Petersville
・ Petersville (disambiguation)
・ Petersville Parish, New Brunswick
・ Petersville, Alaska
・ Petersville, Illinois
・ Petersville, Indiana
・ Petersville, Iowa
・ Petersville, Maryland
・ Petersville, Wisconsin
Peterswald v Bartley
・ Peterswald-Löffelscheid
・ Petertide
・ Peterton, Kansas
・ Peteru
・ Petervale
・ Peterview
・ Peterville, Prince Edward Island
・ Peterwitz
・ Peter–Weyl theorem
・ Petes Landing, Wisconsin
・ Peteski
・ PeteStrumentals
・ PeteStrumentals 2
・ Petete y Trapito


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Peterswald v Bartley : ウィキペディア英語版
Peterswald v Bartley

''Peterswald v Bartley'' (1904) 1 CLR 497 is an early High Court of Australia case that dealt with section 90 of the Australian Constitution, which prohibits States from levying excise.
Per Griffith CJ, an excise is a customs duty imposed on goods either in relation to quantity or value when produced or manufactured and not in the sense of a direct or personal tax. His Honour outlined four elements:
* The goods must be locally produced within the State.
* The tax must be imposed at the point of production or manufacture.
* The tax must be imposed in proportion to the quantity or value of the goods in question.
* It must be an indirect tax that gets passed on to the consumer through a higher price of goods.
His Honour's requirement that the tax be imposed at the point of production or manufacture forms what is known as the narrow approach to section 90. This is no longer the case: ''Ha v New South Wales''.
== See also ==

* Australian constitutional law

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Peterswald v Bartley」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.